
NEW WAVES BREAK AROUND PSYCHOTHERAPY IN THE PACIFIC
A.Roy Bowden.
Psychotherapy is well established in the dominant cultures in Australia and New Zealand. It has yet to establish a strong base in indigenous cultures within Australasia and the South Pacific. In the Pacific region traditional psychotherapeutic theory needs expansion and enhanced practice skills. Modalities and methods need review as healing concepts within different cultures are acknowledged. In order to study culturally based healing practices in the Pacific region new research methods need to be developed. It will be important to listen to narratives that suggest different ways of working and rely on wisdom from culturally informed practitioners and clients. By acknowledging the importance of concepts which challenge us to revise our current practice we will enhance psychotherapy as a discipline making it accessible to a wider consumer population, especially those who have a different understanding of the word ‘psychotherapy’.
Key Words
Reviewed theory, Enhanced practice, Cultural focus, New narratives
NEW WAVES BREAK AROUND PSYCHOTHERAPY IN THE PACIFIC
Psychotherapy in New Zealand is changing as culturally based practitioners encourage Pakeha therapists to review traditional psychotherapeutic theory and skills. The New Zealand Association of Psychotherapists is building a partnership with Waka Oranga, the Rununga, (national collective) of Maori therapists and is faced with two important questions: “What words can we use to describe psychotherapy practices within culturally based settings?” and, “How can we retain traditional psychotherapeutic theory and methods and add new perspectives from Maori and Pacific therapists?” We need a new focus for our region now that we have come of age. In Australasia people contribute new cultural beliefs from the South Pacific, Asia and other regions. People in these settings have profound philosophical approaches to hardship, despair and suffering quite different from the belief systems which produced psychodynamics or psychoanalysis. The tendency has been to separate spirit from matter, meaning from analysis and abstraction from reality. The Pacific way is more like a fine mat, full of colour, threads and interconnection. Maori and Pacific based approaches to healing have separate differences which challenge many of the principles built into psychotherapy practice. Psychotherapy has developed in New Zealand by importing ideas from research carried out in other countries and most of the psychodynamic principles that are relied on place the individual at the centre of therapeutic process. I am suggesting we consider traditional psychodynamics as one way of approaching clients and expand our practice to include more dimensions.
It will be important to ensure Maori and Pacific therapists retain ownership over their cultural practices.
In New Zealand, Te Ao Maori, the world of Maori, enshrines history and meanings we should not borrow in order to support Pakeha environments. I write as a Pakeha New Zealander fully aware that I am moving from my own understandings into a different world, the world of those who allow me to walk on land which is Papatuanuku, mother earth. When I attempt to align traditional psychotherapeutic theory with information my cultural partners share with me I must keep checking with them in order to review my understandings.
Makere Stewart-Harawira writes, “For Maori...sound has deep metaphysical and creative connotations that go beyond its use as the practical instrument of ordinary communication. The cadences of ancient songs, of ritual calls, of sacred chants, through which the world is sung into existence, the flesh is sung onto the bones, and the relationships are sung which bind all together within the Cosmos, express what Knudston and Suzuki refer to as ‘bringing a measure of harmony to the Cosmos’ and breathing ‘life into the network of subtle connections between human beings and the entire natural world.” (Stewart-Harawira, M. 2005) (i)
The dimensions Makere Stewart-Harawira brings to our attention can be woven into psychotherapy practice if we think beyond accepted psychodynamic concepts and listen to voices within cultural environments.
Those of us who have lived around Pacific shores sometimes know what to listen for. When people withdraw into themselves in Aotearoa we know the causes may not be the same as classical symptoms of depression described in psychological theory. We know to listen for damage to the spirit, failure of family systems, loss of identity and no place to call home. We are likely to listen for songs that need to be sung, poverty that cripples family life, prejudice that ignores potential and aroha withheld during important moments. We listen for sounds of anger at not belonging and words from those who feel marginalised. We know there is huge emotional turmoil but instead of structuring therapy we try to approach it with a combination of improvised understanding and challenge. If we listen for shifts of register in the moment we are likely to listen for longer. The unhurried tempo of the Pacific has much to offer clients who have not been heard. The natural environment is one of ebb and flow, seasonal energies and close connections.
Psychotherapists whose training is based on foundation theorists with cultural roots in other parts of the world have been trained to honour the soul of the individual. I am a Pakeha psychotherapeutic healing practitioner who was originally taught to explore the individual psyche. The history of psychotherapy highlights pathways in the mind, layers of feelings and complicated desires embedded in the body of one person, one separate soul. The pursuit of knowledge about the person of each individual has often been the sole focus of traditional psychotherapies and, in Aotearoa, New Zealand, I have been part of an emerging movement which challenges this view. Over the years in New Zealand, therapists have broadened their vision to include systemic influences which surround each person. Movements such as family therapy have made some inroads but many therapists remain intensely fascinated by what happens inside the skin and inside the mind and heart of a single human being.
Insights from within Aotearoa
When I cross the bridge from my culture to the indigenous Maori culture in New Zealand I need to honour something different from my own experience. I am encouraged to honour a belief system which sees each person not only as an individual but as someone who is interwoven with the natural world, ancestors who are still alive in the community of the living and unseen influences often named as spiritual. Maori have taught me that Tangata Whenua, the people of the land, place importance on relationship, interconnection and interdependence. While there is individuality, personal identity is taken from the land, the iwi, the hapu and the whanau, which are names for the tribe extended family groups and the family unit. Identity is interwoven with the cultural grouping. When I begin to cross the cultural bridge I am about to encounter an atmosphere in indigenous culture that is a huge challenge to the way I see my ‘self’. Accordingly, I am increasingly impatient with the view that psychotherapy only heal individuals.
When consulting therapists for my own therapy I have been encouraged to view my ‘self’ as a separate identity which no other person has a right to touch without permission, intrude upon or manipulate by ignoring my personal preferences and boundaries. That kind of therapy satisfies my need to understand the complicated pathways set within my own skin but fails to acknowledge the way I merge with every other important influence. The challenge to think differently comes not only from indigenous people. The idea that the skin is a permeable membrane is found in philosophical, psychological and spiritual writings. It is an insight which moves me away from isolated individualism and helps me move traditional psychotherapy closer to healing paradigms based on interdependence. Ken Wilber’s words have had a lasting influence on me: “The most common boundary line that individuals draw up or accept as valid is that of the skin boundary surrounding the total organism. Everything on the inside of that skin boundary is in some sense ‘me’, while everything outside that boundary is ‘not me’”. And later, “Any sort of boundary is a mere abstraction from the seamless coat of the universe, and hence all boundaries are pure illusions in the sense that they create separation (and ultimately conflict) where there is none.” (Wilber, K 1979) (ii). My thesis is that when we draw boundaries between individualism and interdependence the bridge between traditional psychotherapy and indigenous people is very difficult to cross.
An ever changing sea of meanings
What lies between the emphasis on the internal psyche which underpins most psychotherapeutic modalities and the indigenous culture which surrounds me in Aotearoa is an ever changing sea of meanings. To cross from one to the other I will cross as it were, by sea, and not through the sky or over land. If I cross by air I will not experience ocean currents that teach me to carry my ‘self’ with me. If I travel over land I will be comparing the landscape with what I know already. If I move through the waters of meaning I must be content to allow them to come and go, for they are fluid and defy definition. The shores of the culture I reach will also be changing as the sea of meanings works away at the boundaries of the land.
In New Zealand Pakeha have often asked the question, “How should psychotherapists who are non-Maori work with Maori?” It is a question that ignores an important insight. The insight is that there is no such phenomenon as a static set of cultural meanings. To decide that there is a static Pakeha culture and a static Maori culture is to make the same error as psychotherapeutic theorists have made throughout history. Theorists have decided there is ‘an individual’ and ‘a group’ as if there is a time to be an individual and a time to be psychically connected to a group or culture. Of course there are meanings which arise when a person is alone and different meanings when a person meets with a group but they exist within a sea of meanings and one framework ought not to be at the expense of the other. The divisions in traditional psychotherapy emphasise separateness. Each modality chooses an aspect of human development to highlight. Some highlight an aspect of mind, others emotions, and the body is, of course, another choice. Many offer behavioural formulations. The fascinating array includes methods based on the work of historical figures while others centre around living legends whose work is copied by practitioners. The anomaly is that these separatist paradigms exist in a profession that purports to be focused on the whole person in a connected universe surrounded by multiple cultures, belief systems, and values.
Crossing the bridge in Aotearoa
The bridge from Pakeha culture to Maori culture in New Zealand cannot be crossed if I am already a convert to a particular approach to psychotherapy. Singular belief systems perpetuate the myth that client persons can be successfully approached using a premise first and relationship as a secondary consideration. In New Zealand this separatist process sits uneasily alongside the indigenous culture which has the notion of interconnection as fundamental. Nothing stands alone in Maoritanga, no one part of the person can exist without every aspect of existence cooperating to provide impetus for the life force. While the mind (hinengaro), the body (tinana) spirit (wairua) and the family (whanau) are named separately one cannot be highlighted or studied without reference to the other three. Maori have a concept called Whanaungatanga. The idea that one is an individual is complicated by the fact that “....the basic responsibility is that one must be prepared to sacrifice one’s individual interests and gratifications to those of the whanau, and, “the place of the family in Polynesian society is difficult for Pakeha to understand when the measuring rod is the concept of individualism”. (Jackson, M. 1988) (iii) Whenever human development is discussed the focus is on weaving threads together. Almost without exception the symbols in Maori art and carvings are based on ideas woven together, there is no stark separation of body mind and spirit and no separation of the individual from community or history. One cannot be a psychotherapist in this cultural setting and work towards health by focusing on parts of the personality or by using separate concepts such as behavioural change, emotional catharsis or body centred therapy. Therapists who decide that Jungian therapy has links with Maoritanga or assume that Gestalt, Hakomi or Transactional Analysis have ideas in common with the way Maori see the world are moving quickly down the path of colonisation. It is important I move towards indigenous people in my country with an open mind. My mind needs to be so open that I am ready, if necessary, to change my mind about some of the basic tenets of psychotherapeutic process.
To work with an overall model promoting the idea that human beings have separate parts which function independently and can be treated independently of each other is often culturally inappropriate. I am not suggesting we abandon focused research into the human brain, the body or emotional chemistry. Nor am I suggesting we abandon theoretical paradigms. I am suggesting we begin to imagine psychotherapy as a process which reflects the interdependence of human knowledge. The knowledge we are privileged to own in this millennium highlights the point that meaning and health are embedded in connections that may be indefinable. Psychotherapy modalities choose defined portions of human systems and expect adherence to methods which are definitive about human systems. To move away from definition and structured premise is to move into uncertainty. An un-certain approach leads to creativity and challenges therapists to work without pre determined ideas.
No prescribed agenda
As I step off the cross cultural bridge I can retain the person and the therapist I am but I must greet the other culture knowing I might have to question all I know. There cannot be an agenda, there cannot be certainty or evangelism. The challenge is to allow meanings to merge and resist analysing. Many traditional approaches to psychotherapy depend on an analytical framework focusing on taking wholeness to pieces in an attempt to understand intra psychic, inter personal or systemic connections. If I am to make good connections with my cultural partners I will need to suspend analysis and define therapy as the contemplation of multiple insights. These multiple insights are different in each place in the world. A single modality cannot propose a way to connect with the diversity of insight which is first formed within culture. Modalities assume insight is first formed emotionally, physically, intellectually or spiritually. Now that we have a global awareness the truth is that insight can be grounded in culture.
The facets of the diamond I contemplate with clients in New Zealand are flash points filled with cultural meanings. There are a number of cultural truths in our multi cultural society which capture insights. Insights are mirrored in ancient stories, rituals watched by children, experiences in peer groups, adolescent transitions, marriage and family observances. The multi faceted diamond which beckons in the moment of insight is affected by ancient ancestors who are living in the present. Any attempt to introduce a designed intervention method while an ancestor is speaking to the heart of the client may be overly intrusive. Maori clients, like people in many other cultures, know their mountains, rivers and land forms are speaking, acting, reminding and calling while the therapist joins them in contemplation. Psychotherapy can be made out of a tradition stretching back to the beginning of time, to Te Kore, the void. In this cultural environment it is also possible that historical events are being replayed in the present. Psychotherapy is made within the context of cultural moments. If it is pre designed and pre formatted, it will ignore the sea of meanings which are always changing. To make psychotherapy in moments when myth and legend are being relived is a process I cannot design and must not surround with theory. There is something much more exciting to do. I can establish cross cultural therapeutic moments when I suspend definition.
We need psychotherapists in different cultural settings around the globe to believe in their own creative ideas as they learn from cultures different from their own. These ideas will change as each client appreciates a therapeutic connection initiated by the therapist without being gleaned from a textbook. These connections arise out of an appreciation of each moment, permission for the client to discover their own world of meanings and a willingness to work with what Maori insight has called ‘the nothing and the not nothing’.
Psychotherapeutic formulations will always exist in world class libraries, digital environments and teaching rooms. It is good to read them but it is important to close the door of the library before we meet our clients. Clients have a world wide web in their hearts and minds and pages filled with surprises which are worth downloading in the moment. They should never be saved to a file. A culturally based psychotherapy will rely on description rather than analysis. Once an analysis is made the cultural truths have been colonised. Throughout the history of psychotherapy we have done little to investigate the therapeutic power of description. The descriptive therapist will be curious and reflective without relying on formulations. Attempts at understanding are born of the desire to capture and to possess. A culturally sensitive psychotherapy reflects the world it senses and describes what it observes. Imagine the power of allowing description to be sufficient. In our communities we have the opportunity to meet with people from a variety of cultures. If we met in psychotherapeutic moments with no pre-designed parameters, no assumptions about who we each happen to be and no attempts to capture meanings we might discover merged edges of understanding.
The future of a psychotherapy which creates good cultural connection lies in the willingness to describe psychic and social associations rather than analyse them. “There is no progressively refined story to tell about the human condition which leads to a single view of the nature of reality. There is, instead a concept of truth as a mobile army of metaphors that capture our minds so we see the world in certain ways. The increasingly rational view of the world trumpeted by scientific realism is characterised as an illusion, and particularly when we try to understand human beings, a much more fluid formation is suggested.” (Gillett, G. 1999) (iv)
Making it work
How might this work in the New Zealand situation? I have been taught to imagine each person with an individualised psyche holding personal historical information best released (or integrated) through some form of psychologically based therapy. My training leads me to focus on client emotions, thoughts and physical responses to their relationships. I also look for causal relationships thinking that one historical event or trauma causes another to occur later in life. In addition, I have been trained into an expectation that unhappy, disturbed or unsettled people can be ‘helped’ or ‘treated successfully’ by meeting with a sensitive therapist. I will have a very narrow experience and learn little if I cling to those injunctions.
The psychological view of mind is often presented as a definitive reality. This is however, capable of a wider vision as instanced in the connections between two worlds, one psychoanalytic and the other transpersonal. Before offering the gift of psychological knowledge it is important to establish relationship, to test the meaning of the meeting about to take place and to accept that what will be given in return is just as powerful as any insights fashioned in my culture. It is tempting to build a bridge between psychotherapy and cultural concepts. Pakeha have no right to build the bridge without first entering the sea of meanings and risking not knowing. The connections I have made already are part of my slow movement across the sea from the culture of psychotherapy to my experiences with Maori. I do not have a need to be definitive and that helps me stay curious. I am strongly of the view that psychotherapy will progress further in a mixed cultural environment only by relinquishing the drive to define moments, develop fixed theories and establish modalities. There is no openness to culture when definition is the goal. Ideas need to flow like the sea.
How then might we proceed? I draw your attention to a belief which is centuries old in the indigenous culture of Aotearoa New Zealand. “The Maori traditional belief is that the whole of creation is a dynamic movement I te kore, ki te poo, ki te ao maarama, ‘out of the nothingness, into the night, into the world of light”. (Patterson,J. 2000) (v)
It is, in a less profound way, a description of the way I work. It involves the desire to focus on ‘the nothing and the not nothing’. What is the nothing and the not nothing? I have been told by people willing to share with me that it can be described as ‘the void’, ‘potential’, or ‘energy’ in Maori understandings. It can be represented as ‘the void in which nothing is possessed’, ‘the void with nothing in union’,‘the space without boundaries’. It can also be ‘the void in which nothing is felt’. If I establish a relationship with people from another culture psychotherapy is created in moments. The moments must begin as if there were nothing apart from the light and perhaps the darkness we both bring. As I hold the sum total of who I am in my being and wait for my ‘self’ to be met by ‘the other’ we make psychotherapy for that spontaneous meeting. The psyche is merging with therapeutic process, the soul is surprised by relationship. Within that relationship moment every strand of knowledge I have absorbed, each conditioned aspect of my existence, every cultural icon and intangible spirit affects the foundation of my being. I dare not allow my mind to conjure a theory of personality or a therapeutic method. If I search for explanation or method I will stifle my own creativity, I will lose my ‘self’. Recall a theory and connection is lost. Apply a method and the other person will be imprisoned.
Skills beyond method
Psychotherapy may offer something to cultures which is beyond method. Perhaps we offer the innate skill that forms in the heart of every therapist; the ability to be present and vulnerable. Therapists practice different rituals to maintain vulnerability. They are more important than rituals which maintain certainty. Therapy is, after all, an art form. Artistic endeavours create magnificent bridges across cultural divides. Therapy as an art form makes way for ‘not knowing’ from which arise creative moments that produce understanding. Another gift is, perhaps, our awareness of word meanings. Earlier I mentioned that words have been the main focus of psychotherapy and suggested a wider perspective to include other channels for expression. Our gift is perhaps the ability to teach the importance of nuance and the tracking of pathways called associations. We know how to listen for meanings beneath the surface of the mind which are not only important in the psyche but may be important in cultural formation. “The skill of the therapist lies in the ability to expect the universe to speak. The spiritual formation that is occurring will leave both therapist and client speechless. The silent therapist has already made a difference”. (Bowden, A. R. 2001) (vi)
What we are trained to listen for is what Gillett calls discursive narrative. This is story that cannot be defined only in scientific terms. He says “The human psyche is a remarkable creation born of the impingement of word on flesh, or, if you prefer, discourse on the body. This soul or psyche is a unique metaphysical species which, in itself, has given birth to both metaphysics and epistemology. Unfortunately the psyche has a tendency to become bewitched by the beauty of its own creation. The light of reason can, however, allow us to take an ironic or even gay (in Nietzche’s sense) attitude towards our epistemic offspring-philosophy, psychiatry and psychology-and it is in that attitude that this (Gillett’s) book has been conceived” (Gillett, G. 1999) (vii)
The psychological meanings of words in their cultural contexts may therefore take us into realms we participate in by being content with the way the stories are told. This is an area where we need to tread with caution as theorists often claim ownership of meanings and take them away from cultural contexts. The process is more important than the ownership of meaning. The skill lies in being able to describe and let lie, highlight and listen for response. It involves giving up the desire to capture words and allow them to fill moments in time. The gift from the trained psychotherapist ought to be offered unwrapped. It might mean suspending knowledge. In Aotearoa-New Zealand ‘Maori have kete or baskets of knowledge which are highly valued. My challenge to psychotherapists is to keep our baskets of knowledge open beside us instead of using them as shields. As our cultural partners lift their taonga or treasures from their kete it is a sign of trust. Psychotherapists know that the moment of trust is the moment to release profound truths for only in those moments will therapist and client be united. Relationship can function only if both people are being themselves in the moment. I return to the word ‘moment’. It is the creative moment, the moment when two people trust themselves and the universe so well that old paradigms are reborn and ancient myths have new meanings. Cultural understandings begin, and may end, with not knowing. If we are to spread the influence of psychotherapy in the Pacific region we need to gather what we have already learnt and experienced and build new libraries of knowledge. New collections of knowledge will include that which has gone before and we will slowly gather that which is yet to come.
References
(i) Stewart-Harawira, Makere, The imperial order –Indigenous responses to globalization. 2005 p38 Huia Publishers
(ii) Wilbur, K., No boundary.1979, p40 Shambala Publications
(iii) Jackson, Moana The Maori and the criminal justice system, a new perspective: He Whaipanga Hou. In: Patterson, J. Exploring Maori values, 1992. p146-147, Dunmore Press, New Zealand
(iv) Gillett, G., The mind and its discontents-an essay in discursive psychiatry. 1999 p 38 Oxford University Press
(v) Patterson, J. People of the land. 2000 p112 Dunmore Press, Palmerston North New Zealand
(vi) Bowden, R. A psychotherapist sings in Aotearoa 2001. p57 Caroy Publications, Plimmerton, NZ
(vii) Gillett, G. The Mind and its discontents-an essay in discursive psychiatry 1999 p426 Oxford University Press
(viii) Nga Waka Tohunga (Canoes of the Tohunga). A work by John Bevan Ford, International Maori Artist and Carver. The kahu or cloak over the water represents mana
Note: Cultural understandings in the paper were initially reviewed by John Bevan Ford
Glossary
Aotearoa Whole of New Zealand Wairua Spirit, Soul
Aroha Love, Sympathise Whakapapa Genealogy, Cultural identity
Hapu Sub tribe, Pregnant Whanau Extended Family
Hinengaro Mind, Intellect Whanaungatanga Relationship
Iwi Tribe, People Note: Definitions were sourced from
Kete Carrier, bag Ryan, P.M. The Dictionary of Modern Maori
Mana Prestige, respect 1999 Heinemann Education, Reed Publishing
Maori People of the Land Meanings vary and are approximate
Maoritanga Maori culture, Maori perspective
Pakeha Non-Maori, European, Caucasian
Papatuanuku Mother earth, the land which sustains
Rununga Group
Taonga Traditions,Treasure
Tangata Whenua` Local people, Aborigine, Native
Te Ao Maori The World of Maori
Tohunga Specialist in ancient Maori lore, traditions, religions and rituals
Te Kore The Void
Wairua Spirit, Soul, Attitude >>
Whakapapa Genealogy, Cultural identity
Whanua Extended Family, Delivery, give Birth
Whanaungatanga Relationship
Source: Ryan, P.M. Dictionary of modern Maori 1999. Heinemann Education, Reed Publishing, NZ

